🛜 “a coward and a moron”

After I deleted the comment, he tried again;

That apparently wasn’t enough for him because he texted me a few moments later. He had my number because we had met in 2008 at Winter Soldier:Iraq and Afghanistan.


After I deleted the comment, he tried again;

That apparently wasn’t enough for him because he texted me a few moments later. He had my number because we had met in 2008 at Winter Soldier:Iraq and Afghanistan.

The attached email is correspondence, not conferral. LR 7-1(a)(1)(A) requires a personal or telephone conference; an email exchange doesn't substitute for one, however it's characterized. I offered three specific call times on September 13; none has been accepted. Plaintiff renews its opposition
Attached is a copy of my earlier email today with Mr. Isaac discussing my desire to have conferral by email rather than phone or in person. My ability to prove a prior conversation this way is the reason I want to limit conversations to email.
Plaintiff opposes Ms. White's request to require all party conferrals to be conducted by email. No good cause is shown. Ms. White's stated reason — wanting an "accurate record" of conversations — identifies no specific incident from this case's phone or personal conferrals that
Thank you for your response. I am sorry to trouble you with an additional matter, which I am happy to file as a motion if that would be better. I am requesting the Court to allow conferrals between the parties by email, rather than by personal or telephone contact. Plaintiff