GIJustice
  • Home
  • About
  • Isaac v. Manning
Sign in Subscribe
Nikki Gold

📧 “OSU Student Veterans” to Nikki Gold (ignored)

Logan M. Isaac

16 Apr 2025
Share
📧 “OSU Student Veterans” to Nikki Gold (ignored)

Hi again just checking in on this :-)

Read more

Renewed Motion to Compel (ECF 33)

Renewed Motion to Compel (ECF 33)

Isaac v. Manning et al., No. 6:25-cv-01159-MC (D. Or.) is a federal civil-rights lawsuit against James Ivory Manning Jr., Shelly Boshart Davis, Renee Perry, and Doe defendants, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon on July 3, 2025. Docket Text:

By Logan M Isaac 27 Aug 2026
đź“§ to White "Two points, briefly"

đź“§ to White "Two points, briefly"

Tracy, Thank you for the response. Two points, briefly. First, on the "not part of the operative complaint" objection: LAC has already produced ISAAC-LAC-SDT-000249, a document from this same date and subject matter, without maintaining a relevance objection against it. I'm not asking

By Logan M Isaac 11 Aug 2026
đź“§ from White "We are not planning to produce"

đź“§ from White "We are not planning to produce"

Hi Logan, We are not planning to produce those.  The Court has limited the case to the two Capitol restrictions occurring in January and February 2025.  There is no indication this “threat assessment” bears on those.

By Logan M Isaac 11 Aug 2026
đź“§ to White "we have conferred"

đź“§ to White "we have conferred"

Tracy, To be precise: I have not expressed a feeling. Fed. R. Civ. P. 33(b)(1)(A), 34(b)(2)(A), and 36(a)(3) places the response obligation on "the party to whom the request is directed." I'd ask that my position be addressed

By Logan M Isaac 11 Aug 2026

GIJustice

Protected class in the statutes. Second-class in the streets.

GIJustice
  • Sign up
  • Employment
  • Hate Crimes
Powered by Ghost