Michael Hoselton

📧 Hoselton: "I would shoot" my political opponent

You got it boss! The file is 63MB, so Google has required it to be sent via Google Drive. I also uploaded it to YouTube (https://youtu.be/5_kD5jMvqfs), but I removed filler words.

The file is completely unedited though.

I can also send a scan of the print article in which you say "I want... a gun..., I would shoot [budget committee chair Irvin Brown]." I will ask why Oregon employs people who can say discomforting things, but when a veteran does it, Oregon sends armed enforcement agents without anything to enforce but pearl-clutching "subjective" feelings.

Detail of Salem Reporter article. Imagine if context didn't matter...!

📧 to McShane: "email is correspondence, not conferral"

The attached email is correspondence, not conferral. LR 7-1(a)(1)(A) requires a personal or telephone conference; an email exchange doesn't substitute for one, however it's characterized. I offered three specific call times on September 13; none has been accepted. Plaintiff renews its opposition

📧 from White: "My ability to prove a prior conversation"

Attached is a copy of my earlier email today with Mr. Isaac discussing my desire to have conferral by email rather than phone or in person. My ability to prove a prior conversation this way is the reason I want to limit conversations to email.

📧 to McShane: "No good cause is shown"

Plaintiff opposes Ms. White's request to require all party conferrals to be conducted by email. No good cause is shown. Ms. White's stated reason — wanting an "accurate record" of conversations — identifies no specific incident from this case's phone or personal conferrals that

📧 from White: "I want to be sure any conversations... be accurately recorded"

Thank you for your response. I am sorry to trouble you with an additional matter, which I am happy to file as a motion if that would be better. I am requesting the Court to allow conferrals between the parties by email, rather than by personal or telephone contact. Plaintiff

Read more

📧 to McShane: "email is correspondence, not conferral"

📧 from White: "My ability to prove a prior conversation"

📧 to McShane: "No good cause is shown"

📧 from White: "I want to be sure any conversations... be accurately recorded"