📧 to McShane: "extending any Davis-specific deadline"
Noted — to be clear, Plaintiff's objection to extending any Davis-specific deadline without a Davis-specific reason stands, regardless of scope.
Read more
📞 with Chelsea Wein
Chelsea Wein: [00:00:00] Logan, I've been on the phone with you all week. I have other cases that I have to work on as well. Logan Martin Isaac: Hey, I have- Chelsea Wein: Quite frankly- Logan Martin Isaac: I don't love all my jobs
📧 to USDOJ: "confirming today's conferral"
To confirm our call this afternoon: you stated that the DOJ intends to move to dismiss on three grounds: (1) standing, because the name on the FOIA requests differs from the plaintiff's; (2) failure to exhaust administrative remedies as to the Civil Rights Division; and (3) alleged alteration
📧 to USDOJ: "Adequacy of Search"
I received NSD's final response dated September 23, 2026. It released one page in part, relating to the 2021 Olson matter. Before we go further, I want to raise a specific concern about how NSD searched. My request asked for cases "in which 18 U.S.C.
✉️ NSD Final FOIA Response
This is the National Security Division's ('NSD') final response to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request dated March 19, 2026, requesting records regarding 18 U.S.C. § 1389. As noted in our March 27, 2026 acknowledgment letter to you, your FOIA request was assigned reference