ORDOJ

📧 from ORDOJ: "hyperbolic and unpersuasive"

I stand by my earlier communication to you. Comparing any custom to “Jim Crow” is, to say the least, hyperbolic and unpersuasive. Nor is an estimate a binding promise, no matter how much you may view it as such. Because we have no faith in you accurately recounting communications not made in writing, I agree that you have satisfied your requirement to confer under Rule 7-1. Beyond that, I see no further point in this back-and-forth. It will not be resolved without judicial intervention, then that is where you should go.

📧 from Abrams: "I suggest you conduct yourself respectfully"

I will be defending the Representative’s deposition. I do not agree with any statement in your notice of deposition that exceeds the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Nor do I agree that this deposition will remain open for any purpose without a Court Order to that effect. When the

📧 to Gunderson: Representation

Mx Gunderson, I anticipate serving Therese Bottomly and Betsy Hammond after The Oregonian was named in a deposition by the OR DOJ last week; https://gijustice.com/20261105-1315-ordoj/ I have two questions I need answered, 1) will The Oregonian represent either Bottomly or Hammond in this matter, and

🔊 voicemail to OSU

This is a message for Melissa, uh, Rawlinson. This is Logan Isaac. Um, I don't– I can't remember if I told you, but, um, I was deposed today by the state of Oregon, and your name came up, and Oregon State University came up. Um, and

ORDOJ Deposition p.3: "What is our freedom worth?"

[00:00:00] Jill Schneider, ORDOJ: State is ready videographer: Thank you. Ms. Douglas? Jill Schneider, ORDOJ: Yep. videographer: Thank you very much. Please stand by, everybody Going back on the record at the time is 124 Jill Schneider, ORDOJ: So we are back on the record now. Uh, we

Read more

📧 from Abrams: "I suggest you conduct yourself respectfully"

📧 to Gunderson: Representation

🔊 voicemail to OSU

ORDOJ Deposition p.3: "What is our freedom worth?"