Logan M Isaac - Adventures in Veteraning (Page 4)

6-25-CV-01159-MC

📧 ORDOJ to (D.Or)

Charlene— Plaintiff Logan Isaac has submitted this motion to compel discovery rather than, as is my understanding of Judge McShane’s preferences, merely requested an informal telephonic conference. I am sitting in on this matter for counsel Tracy White, who is on vacation this week and next. I am perfectly

ORDOJ

from Abrams: "let's DELETE [religious/ADA accommodation]"

Rebecca, Alice— Unless Tracy has specifically said otherwise, let’s DELETE [Br. Timothy, HoSM] from all communications. He is not an attorney, not a member of a legal staff. He’s simply Mr. Isaac’s buddy who he calls a “paralegal but that is an insult to Alice and crew!

6-25-CV-01159-MC

📧 "Documents to be produced" to OSU

SCHEDULE A — DOCUMENTS AND THINGS TO BE PRODUCED Subpoena Recipient: Office of General Counsel - Oregon State University (Department of Public Safety), 630 Kerr Administration Building, Corvallis, Oregon 97331 Case: Isaac v. Boshart Davis et al., No. 6:25-cv-01159-MC (D. Or.) Issuing Court: United States District Court, District

False Arrest

📧 "Resolution proposal" to OSU

Ms. [Rebecca] Gose and colleagues, I'd like to resolve this without litigation. OSU's own report, Case 202600281, records my April 1, 2026 arrest as "Unfounded." The exclusion behind it expired January 22, 2026 and was never cleared from RMS or LEDS. I propose: 1.

ORDOJ

📧 from ORDOJ: "hyperbolic and unpersuasive"

I stand by my earlier communication to you. Comparing any custom to “Jim Crow” is, to say the least, hyperbolic and unpersuasive. Nor is an estimate a binding promise, no matter how much you may view it as such. Because we have no faith in you accurately recounting communications not

ORDOJ

📧 to ORDOJ: "refer to me by my ecclesiastical title"

Mr. Abrams, 1. Br. Timothy Tribble is my non-attorney litigation assistant and a contemporaneous witness to my conferrals. See ECF 27 (May 29, 2026). 2. Understood as to Ms. Jayne; I will direct requests to you. 3. Pre-motion conferral, LR 7-1(a)(1) and 26-3(g)

ORDOJ

📧 to ORDOJ: "'Standard practice'" is not a right, it is a custom"

See responses in [bold]. On Thu, Oct 1, 2026 at 9:43 AM Marc Abrams <Marc.Abrams@doj.oregon.gov> wrote: Mr. Isaac— As to the deposition of Ms. Perry, the defense will take no position on your motion. This comment by Ms. Perry seems speculative. However, if

ORDOJ

📧 from Abrams: "a party has proven to be an unreliable narrator"

First of all, please do not presume to give direction to Ms. Jayne. She works for the Department of Justice and is part of the team representing defendants. She does not work for you and, to the extent any of your requests conform to the Rules of Civil Procedure, I

ORDOJ

📧 to ORDOJ: "Mr. Abrams may answer"

Thank you for the re-send. I will compare it against the 9/25 folder and report any difference. 1. My reaction. My 👍 to Ms. White's September 25, 4:04 PM email acknowledged receipt. It did not agree that a reduced production satisfies the July 30 representation of

6-25-CV-01159-MC

📧 Subpoena to OSU DPS

I am the pro se plaintiff in Isaac v. Manning et al., No. 6:25-cv-01159-MC (D. Or.) (McShane, C.J.). Fact discovery closes November 5, 2026. I called your office on September 28, 2026, and came to Kerr Administration this morning, October 1, 2026, but could not

ORDOJ

📧 from Abrams: "Ms. Perry seems speculative"

As to the deposition of Ms. Perry, the defense will take no position on your motion. This comment by Ms. Perry seems speculative. However, if Judge McShane agrees with your concerns, we will not oppose. As to the Davis deposition, I see no basis in your communication for that deposition

ORDOJ

📧 from ORDOJ: "pages are missing"

I just looked at the production that went out Friday and no pages are missing between ISAAC-LAC-SDT-000273 and ISAAC-LAC-SDT-000490. I will re-send it just in case, but none are missing when I look at it. A privilege log will be provided after Tracy