Court filings for Isaac v. Manning et. al.
Oregon
COMES NOW Plaintiff Logan Martin Isaac, appearing pro se and in forma pauperis, and submits this Second Amended Complaint pursuant to the Court's November 26, 2025 Opinion and Order (ECF No. 12), which granted leave to amend identified deficiencies. I. INTRODUCTION This is a civil rights action under
6-25-CV-01159-MC
MCSHANE, Judge: Self-represented Plaintiff, Logan Martin Isaac, proceeding in forma pauperis ("IFP"), brought this action against Oregon legislators and legislative staff who allegedly deprived him of his constitutional rights. Compl., ECF No. 1. Following screening of his Complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
6-25-CV-01159-MC
INTRODUCTION 1. This is a civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985(3) to redress violations of Plaintiff's rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. 2. Plaintiff Logan Martin Isaac is a disabled Iraq war veteran who has
James Manning
MCSHANE, Judge: Self-represented Plaintiff, Logan Martin Isaac, seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in this action against Oregon legislators and law enforcement agencies that allegedly deprived him of his constitutional rights. Before the Court, in addition to Plaintiff’s Complaint, is Plaintiff’s Application for Leave to
6-25-CV-01159-MC
Below you will find the names of parties sent Litigation Hold Notices (LHNs) for a federal civil rights lawsuit, Case No. 6:25-cv-01159-MC, either because they are explicitly named in my complaint or because evidence acquired in discovery may expose them to legal liability. LHNs are formal
6-25-CV-01159-MC
INTRODUCTION 1. This is a civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985(3) to redress violations of Plaintiff's rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. 2. Plaintiff Logan Martin Isaac is a disabled Iraq war veteran who has
LAC
On April 17, 2025, Oregon Senate Committee on Veterans co-chair Kim Thatcher sent the following email referencing committee chair James Manning, who killed SB 1057 because a staff member “was confronted in a restaurant… with a video camera.” Just so you know, I did ask for a hearing. In