Court filings for Isaac v. Manning et. al.
ODJ
Noted re: Ms. Jayne. As to Br. Timothy: 'comfort' is not a basis recognized under the Federal Rules for declining to comply with an unopposed, filed notice. Comfort is your personal responsibility, not anyone else's. I note that the State's correspondence in this matter
Tracy White
Dear Mr. Isaac, Alice Jayne is my paralegal, who will be helping with document collection and production. I do not feel comfortable copying Mr. Tribble and do not plan to do so.
ODJ
Who is Alice Jayne (alice.jayne@doj.oregon.gov), and why has the State omitted Br. Timothy Tribble from this correspondence? ECF No. 27, filed and served on all counsel May 29, 2026, eleven days prior to this transmittal, formally noticed Br. Timothy's role and requested his inclusion
6-25-CV-01159-MC
The State Defendants (Rep. Shelly Boshart Davis and Renee Perry) hereby submit their initial disclosures pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a). By disclosing this information, the State Defendants are not waiving any privileges and protections, including attorney-client privilege, work-product privilege, and anticipation of litigation protection. The
6-25-CV-01159-MC
Dear Mr. Isaac, Your email below does not correctly characterize my position in this matter. First, as you know, I represent the named State defendants. Nothing I say is intended as legal advice to you. Second, I do not believe a discovery plan is required in this case.  FRCP 26(
Brett Hanes
“Please see the enclosed letter that rescinds the previous conditions for entry as well as the Capitol’s policies on respectful and harassment free workplace.” Dear Mr. Isaac, Having conducted a one-year review of your conditional entry into the Capitol dated 21 February 2025 and finding no infractions of
6-25-CV-01159-MC
Plaintiff Logan Martin Isaac, proceeding pro se, respectfully submits this voluntary notice regarding Defendants' Answer and Affirmative Defenses filed March 12, 2026. ECF No. 20. Plaintiff does not file this notice as a required pleading under Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), which imposes no obligation on Plaintiff to
6-25-CV-01159-MC
Defendants, except the unnamed Doe Defendants, by and through the undersigned, in response to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, admit, deny, and allege as follows: 1. Senator Manning has been dismissed as a defendant in this action by Court Order, ECF No. 14 (Jan. 22, 2026) (“Order”). Therefore, Defendants deny
6-25-CV-01159-MC
Re: Logan Martin Isaac v. Perry, et al.U.S.D.C. 6:25-cv-01159-MC Notice of Representation of Counsel Dear Mr. Isaac: The above-captioned matter has been referred to me for representation of Shelly Boshart Davis, Renee Perry, and, to the extent still relevant, Senator James
6-25-CV-01159-MC
Order Images Order Text Plaintiff, a self-represented litigant proceeding in forma pauperis, brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Oregon legislators and legislative staff who allegedly deprived him of his constitutional rights. To effectuate service of the Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 13), the Clerk of
6-25-CV-01159-MC
Self-represented Plaintiff, Logan Martin Isaac, proceeding in forma pauperis, brought this action against Oregon legislators and legislative staff who allegedly deprived him of his constitutional rights. The Court screened Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint, 2d Am. Compl., ECF No. 13 ("SAC"), pursuant to 28 U.S.
6-25-CV-01159-MC
Motion Images Motion Text Plaintiff Logan Martin Isaac respectfully renews his request for appointment of pro bono counsel. Since this Court's September 2, 2025 Order denying Plaintiff's initial request, material circumstances have substantially changed that now warrant appointment under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1)