This is Duke

📞 DOL FOIA voicemail

I'm calling the number for the FOIA contacts on the FOIA contacts page for Emily. Emily Su, the Acting Chief FOIA officer at 2 0 2 6 9 3 5 2 6 0 I some difficulty. So we'll see if maybe I can get through.

DOL: Sorry. Solicitor's office is not available. Record your message at the tone. When you are finished, hang up or press pound for more options.

Hi, my name is Logan Isaac. I have a FOIA request for information that I placed December 5th, 2025. On January 27th, I received an email from FOIA request at do signed by an Aretha Dotson asking for information.

I gave her that information, asked for to confirm that she received that information. I did not hear back on again on January, 27th or did I get two emails? I must have gotten two emails from the same person using FOIA requests@d.gov. They have not responded to my emails to confirm that they got my.

The information they were seeking, and they're using a government email address, which tells me that there might have been some kind of bad actor situation going on or hacking. Please give me a call back.. This is in reference to a FOIA request involving a possible compromise of a federal agency or.

Perhaps somebody who just isn't there doing their job. Best case scenario my name again is Logan Isaac, and i'm keeping a copy of this voicemail for public record. Thank you. And.

📧 to White "Two points, briefly"

Tracy, Thank you for the response. Two points, briefly. First, on the "not part of the operative complaint" objection: LAC has already produced ISAAC-LAC-SDT-000249, a document from this same date and subject matter, without maintaining a relevance objection against it. I'm not asking

📧 from White "We are not planning to produce"

Hi Logan, We are not planning to produce those. The Court has limited the case to the two Capitol restrictions occurring in January and February 2025. There is no indication this “threat assessment” bears on those.

📧 to White "we have conferred"

Tracy, To be precise: I have not expressed a feeling. Fed. R. Civ. P. 33(b)(1)(A), 34(b)(2)(A), and 36(a)(3) places the response obligation on "the party to whom the request is directed." I'd ask that my position be addressed

📧 from White "sorry you feel that way"

I’m sorry you feel that way. I will file a motion for an extension. I will state we’ve conferred unless you think we should discuss more? At 1445 Actually, I will be emailing the Court Deputy, as you previously did, to see if a formal motion is necessary.

Read more

📧 to White "Two points, briefly"

📧 from White "We are not planning to produce"

📧 to White "we have conferred"

📧 from White "sorry you feel that way"