Marc Abrams

ORDOJ

📧 from ORDOJ: "hyperbolic and unpersuasive"

I stand by my earlier communication to you. Comparing any custom to “Jim Crow” is, to say the least, hyperbolic and unpersuasive.  Nor is an estimate a binding promise, no matter how much you may view it as such.  Because we have no faith in you accurately recounting communications not

ORDOJ

📧 to ORDOJ: "refer to me by my ecclesiastical title"

Mr. Abrams, 1. Br. Timothy Tribble is my non-attorney litigation assistant and a contemporaneous witness to my conferrals. See ECF 27 (May 29, 2026). 2. Understood as to Ms. Jayne; I will direct requests to you.  3. Pre-motion conferral, LR 7-1(a)(1) and 26-3(g)

ORDOJ

📧 to ORDOJ: "'Standard practice'" is not a right, it is a custom"

See responses in [bold].  On Thu, Oct 1, 2026 at 9:43 AM Marc Abrams <Marc.Abrams@doj.oregon.gov> wrote: Mr. Isaac— As to the deposition of Ms. Perry, the defense will take no position on your motion.  This comment by Ms. Perry seems speculative.  However, if

ORDOJ

📧 from Abrams: "a party has proven to be an unreliable narrator"

First of all, please do not presume to give direction to Ms. Jayne.  She works for the Department of Justice and is part of the team representing defendants.  She does not work for you and, to the extent any of your requests conform to the Rules of Civil Procedure, I

ORDOJ

📧 to ORDOJ: "Mr. Abrams may answer"

Thank you for the re-send. I will compare it against the 9/25 folder and report any difference. 1. My reaction. My 👍 to Ms. White's September 25, 4:04 PM email acknowledged receipt. It did not agree that a reduced production satisfies the July 30 representation of

ORDOJ

📧 from Abrams: "Ms. Perry seems speculative"

As to the deposition of Ms. Perry, the defense will take no position on your motion.  This comment by Ms. Perry seems speculative.  However, if Judge McShane agrees with your concerns, we will not oppose.  As to the Davis deposition, I see no basis in your communication for that deposition

ORDOJ

📧 from ORDOJ: "pages are missing"

I just looked at the production that went out Friday and no pages are missing between ISAAC-LAC-SDT-000273 and ISAAC-LAC-SDT-000490. I will re-send it just in case, but none are missing when I look at it. A privilege log will be provided after Tracy

ORDOJ

📧 to Abrams: "two matters"

Thank you for stepping in for Ms. White. I'm writing about two matters and would like to discuss both by phone. Depositions. In the LAC production I found an email from Ms. Perry to Mr. Hanes dated February 21, 2025, in which she wrote: "If only the

ORDOJ

📧 from White: "Marc Abrams is overseeing this case"

As we discussed, attached are responses to your interrogatories.  The one for Representative Boshart Davis is unsigned, as is her portion of the interrogatories to both defendants. We will send you the signed versions of the latter documents by Oct. 2, as well as red-lined versions if there are