Michael McShane

📧 to McShane: "42 days since service"

Thank you for the call. Per your request, here is what I'm asking the Court to compel from OSP and LAC's June 8, 2026 subpoenas. It has been 42 days since service. Production to date is video and incident reports from OSP; LAC has produced nothing.

📧 from McShane: "would like a response" [fix time]

Judge McShane would like a response to Mr. Isaac’s email by 12:00pm on 7/30.  from ODOJ We will do that.  Is email ok or should it be a filing?  from Court Email to me. from ODOJ Thank you.

6-25-CV-01159-MC

📧 to McShane: "OSP and LAC in continuing non-compliance"

I write to request an informal discovery conference with Judge McShane regarding the Oregon State Police and Legislative Administration Committee's non-compliance with subpoenas in Isaac v. Boshart Davis et al., 6:25-cv-01159-MC. Outline of the dispute: * OSP and LAC were served June 8, 2026

OSU

Notice to OSU

NOTICE OF TORT CLAIM PURSUANT TO ORS 30.275 Claimant: Logan M. Isaac Date of Incident: April 1, 2026 (with related events beginning May 6, 2025) Dear Ms. Gose: This letter constitutes formal notice, pursuant to ORS 30.275, that the undersigned, Logan M. Isaac, intends to assert claims for

Tracy White

from White: "discovery concerns are unjustified"

Dear Ms. Pew, This is in response to Plaintiff’s email regarding the response to subpoenas send to the Oregon State Police (“OSP”) and the Legislative Administration Committee (“LAC”).  I’ve attached copies of the subpoenas here.      First, as I stated in conferral with Plaintiff, LAC is, in fact, searching

Michael McShane

📧 from McShane: "a response from defense"

All,  Judge McShane is going to want a response from defense prior to scheduling a hearing.  If defendants could respond by 12pm tomorrow, I will forward this information to him for review. Thank you.

Michael McShane

📧 to McShane: "issues remain unresolved"

Dear Courtroom Deputy, I am the pro se plaintiff in the above-referenced matter before Chief Judge McShane. I am writing to request an informal telephone conference regarding a discovery dispute with third-party subpoena recipients Oregon State Police and the Legislative Administration Committee, both represented by Tracy Ickes White,

ODJ

📧 to White

Tracy, Two things, separate from the meet-and-confer I sent under the other subject line. First, my preferred title is Brother, or Br. — not Mr. I've noted this before. I'd appreciate it going forward since I have been a Life Professed Member of the Hospitallers

ODJ

📧 from White

Dear Mr. Isaac, I will try to include him as a courtesy to you.  However, I understand he is not your attorney and I do not plan to communicate directly with him.

ODJ

📧 to White

Noted re: Ms. Jayne.  As to Br. Timothy: 'comfort' is not a basis recognized under the Federal Rules for declining to comply with an unopposed, filed notice. Comfort is your personal responsibility, not anyone else's.  I note that the State's correspondence in this matter

Tracy White

📧 from White

Dear Mr. Isaac, Alice Jayne is my paralegal, who will be helping with document collection and production.  I do not feel comfortable copying Mr. Tribble and do not plan to do so.

ODJ

📧 to White

Who is Alice Jayne (alice.jayne@doj.oregon.gov), and why has the State omitted Br. Timothy Tribble from this correspondence?  ECF No. 27, filed and served on all counsel May 29, 2026, eleven days prior to this transmittal, formally noticed Br. Timothy's role and requested his inclusion