DECLARATION OF LOGAN MARTIN ISAAC IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT I, Logan Martin Isaac, declare as follows under 28 U.S.C. § 1746: 1. I am the Plaintiff in this action. I am over eighteen and make this declaration on personal knowledge.
PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT INTRODUCTION Defendant asks the Court to end this case without any component of the Department of Justice ever having to say, after a search, what records it holds about 18 U.S.C. § 1389. Each
Yesterday, at a Scouting event out of town, I learned that [redacted], a Judicial Services Specialist under your employ, contacted a leader in my local Scouting America unit after visiting a local pack last week for their weekly Den meeting. Following his visit, [Corey] reached out to the former leader
DECLARATION OF DAVID O'DOWD IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS I, David O'Dowd, do hereby state and declare as follows: 1. I am the Supervisory Attorney Advisor in the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA") Unit in the National Security Division ("
DECLARATION OF JOHN BUCHKO IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS I, John Buchko, declare the following to be true and correct: 1. I am the Director of Operational Management for the U.S. Department of Justice's (DOJ) Civil Rights Division (CRT) serving as Acting Chief
DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION AND FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LR 7-1 Pursuant to Local Rule 7-1(a)(1)(A), undersigned counsel for Defendant has conferred with Pro Se Plaintiff, and
Chelsea Wein: [00:00:00] Logan, I've been on the phone with you all week. I have other cases that I have to work on as well. Logan Martin Isaac: Hey, I have- Chelsea Wein: Quite frankly- Logan Martin Isaac: I don't love all my jobs
To confirm our call this afternoon: you stated that the DOJ intends to move to dismiss on three grounds: (1) standing, because the name on the FOIA requests differs from the plaintiff's; (2) failure to exhaust administrative remedies as to the Civil Rights Division; and (3) alleged alteration
I received NSD's final response dated September 23, 2026. It released one page in part, relating to the 2021 Olson matter. Before we go further, I want to raise a specific concern about how NSD searched. My request asked for cases "in which 18 U.S.C.
This is the National Security Division's ('NSD') final response to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request dated March 19, 2026, requesting records regarding 18 U.S.C. § 1389. As noted in our March 27, 2026 acknowledgment letter to you, your FOIA request was assigned reference
I have requested an extension for both the NSD and CRD answers, not only the NSD answer. I have filed with the court since I did not hear from you. Your opposition to the extension was noted.
Thank you for the clarification. If you give me a date certain by which the DOJ is willing to represent to the Court that the NSD will submit its Final Response to me, I am willing to grant an extension to the NSD answer. I am not willing to grant